Reducing
costs is important for any organization. And one of
the best ways to reduce costs is to attack the problem
of returned mail.
That's
what the Petersburg Life Insurance Company did recently.
And the effort is yielding impressive savings -- nearly
$600,000 a year in lower postage, handling, materials
and labor costs. Plus, the firm is enjoying much improved
relations with both its customers and agents.
"We
knew for some time that returned mail was a problem
at Petersburg Life," explains Richard Shriner*,
who serves as Director of Document Technology and
Services for the Missouri-based insurer.
"But
we are a decentralized organization and we operate
through eight independent business units. So it was
difficult for us to gauge precisely the various costs
that are associated with returned mail."
For
assistance in determining the full scope of the problem,
Shriner turned to the expertise of Pitney Bowes DMT,
an organization that he worked with in an earlier
job with another insurance company.
"I
was experienced with the DMT Finalist software product,
which is superb for standardizing, verifying and correcting
addresses," he says. "And I thought Finalist
would be involved in our solution in some way,"
he continues.
Quantify
the problem
"But
the eight autonomous business units of Petersburg
Life distribute more than ten million mail pieces
a year across dozens of applications – such
as premium notices, statements of accounts, routine
correspondence and agent commission statements --
and each unit views and handles the problem differently,"
he says.
So the first step was to focus on the facts and find
out exactly how many mail pieces were returned each
year, how they were handled, and how much it cost
to receive, re-process and re-mail the messages.
A
consultant with Pitney Bowes DMT, helped Shriner create
a detailed survey, which was distributed to the eight
business units and served to elicit the pertinent
facts needed to understand the scope and cost of the
problem at Petersburg Life.
According
to Shriner, the survey revealed four key aspects to
the returned mail problem.
First,
more than 650,000 mail pieces -- or roughly 6.5 percent
of the 10 million distributed each year -- were being
returned marked Undeliverable as Addressed (UAA).
Second,
the cost to handle and re-mail those messages, as
well as investigate the invalid address information
and update the firm's customer information database,
was more than $1.1 million a year. That's nearly $2.00
apiece.
Third,
relations with both customers and agents were being
hampered because important communications were being
delayed, and in some instances, not delivered at all.
Fourth,
there was uncertainty as to whether the firm's current
efforts were sufficient to comply with postal regulations
and preserve its postage discount. The survey also
revealed the major costs of returned mail.
- More
than $250,000 was for labor and the manual handling
of returned mail and move notices, and efforts
to contact customers and update the customer database.
- More
than $190,000 was for lost postage for messages
that were never delivered to the recipient.
- More
than $72,000 was for an outside service to investigate
and update invalid addresses.
- More
than $485,000 was for re-generating, re-processing
and re-mailing the messages to a correct address.
To
solve the dilemma, Petersburg Life implemented an
integrated software solution involving three tools
from Pitney Bowes DMT: StreamWeaver for print stream
engineering, Finalist for assuring address quality,
and ForwardTrak for fully meeting the USPS move update
requirement. Here's how the new solution works.
Automated
print stream processing
After
each mailing application is processed at the mainframe,
but before it is received at the print/mail finishing
center, StreamWeaver automatically intercepts the
print stream for conditioning and manipulation.
StreamWeaver
then locates and extracts the name and address information
for each mail piece and calls upon the Finalist software
to standardize, verify and correct each piece e of
address information.
Next,
StreamWeaver invokes ForwardTrak to compares the customer
address data in the print stream with the USPS move
update database, which contains the last 13 months
of move update data. Each address is then updated
as necessary, and an additional file is created and
appended, which enables the Petersburg Life's central
customer database to be easily and automatically updated
in batch mode as well.
Lastly,
StreamWeaver performs a mail piece consolidation function
by searching the print stream for multiple mail pieces
going to the same recipient.
StreamWeaver then re-sequences the print stream so
the related mail pieces are grouped together for easy
inserting into a single envelope. Or, in the case
of agents receiving a large combined mailing, the
materials are grouped together for assembly into a
single package.
As
for results, Petersburg Life has migrated only two
applications to the new solution thus far, but the
improvements are already extraordinary.
Lower
costs, higher productivity
First,
the total number of returned mail pieces from those
two applications has decreased by about 40 percent.
If extrapolated over the insurer's entire annual mail
volume, that means an eventual reduction of about
300,000 returned mail pieces each year, or a savings
of about $600,000.
But
Shriner expects those savings to be even higher over
time because the merging of mail pieces is resulting
in far less outgoing mail. "Our daily outbound
mail volume is now lower by about 15 to 50 percent,
depending on the specific application, which in turn
is influenced by the number of customers holding multiple
policies and the amount of mail going to our agents,"
he says. "But our total of returned mail will
be declining well into the future."
Plus,
Shriner believes even better results will be achieved
once the firm's customer and agent databases receive
regular updating. "We deal with about 60,000
agents and this year we mailed 1099 tax forms to about
17,000 who had commission income in 2001," he
explains. "Typically, that mailing would result
in several hundred pieces of returned mail. But this
year we received only 10."
Lastly,
the decrease in returned mail is allowing the firm
to redeploy its people into higher value and more
productive work. "Before we implemented the solution,
we had the equivalent of 22 full time people working
on some aspect of the returned mail problem,"
continues Shriner.
"We have already migrated most of those people
to other tasks as the volume of returned mail has
decreased." And as an added bonus, Shriner has
learned that shifting the remaining mailing applications
to the new processing solution is far easier than
expected. "First, we were able to implement the
first two applications without any involvement from
our IT people, which is big advantage in time because
of the heavy back log of work they face."
But
just as important, Shriner continues, is the ease
of shifting the subsequent applications to the new
solution format. "The DMT Professional Service
organization has been superb for us," he explains.
"We
engaged DMT to implement the first two applications
for us, so they performed the analysis, prepared the
specifications and wrote the initial programs,"
he continues. "And they came in exactly on time
and on target and without any glitches. Plus, those
original programs were easy for us to replicate, so
we can migrate additional applications with only minimal
additional help, which helps speed our implementation
and eventual pay back on our investment."
*
These names have been changed at our customer’s
request.
Return
to List of Articles